I am here to announce that the appeal for my false ban was denied without reason. It is surely very disappointing to see that staff either does not look at appeals or ban skilled players because they want money from purchasing unbans. This post is not intended to harm the staff team or the community, but to show the ridiculousness of how a false ban is not appealed even with solid evidence clearly showing that it was false. https://media.discordapp.net/attach...8373030961162/image0.png?width=170&height=300 Image in the appeal: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/403280931164782602/469152926825185280/image.png Let the truth be spread about this absurd ruling. I also ask for staff to review the appeal again. I was also banned from the discord for no reason, did not break any rules or anything, just another false ban.
Hm, ok. Instant contradicting statement but they're pretty common for appeals. Let us refer to quote one: This is getting very contradictory. Side note: Is this your first ban? A bad record could cause your ban to be treated in this way.
o-o Maybe you could've just. you know. asked them to fucking screenshare you. So much of this garbage drama can be fixed with a little logic. If you get staff to screenshare you relatively close to the time of your banning they can make sure you obviously didn't delete anything that you might have been using. How do so many people mess this up.
Ahem, the world doesn’t revolve around screenshares. There is other ways to prove that you aren’t hacking, this being one of them. Yes, I have never been punished for anything in my time of playing the server.
I recommend seeing a mental health institution if you really think you “know a thing or two” about someone being salty. And to answer the lord and savior fawnzo’s question, I don’t know who I was banned by.
Actually it confirmes I wasn’t hacking. Look at the very top left, if I was using let’s say, wurst hacked client, it would say “Wurst 1.12.2” or something close to that instead of “minecraft vanilla 1.12.2” or whatever. You should get the point
There are plenty of ghost clients around the Internet, and it's not a hard thing to conceal. Secondly, fastplace is traditionally a overarching term. Fastplace itself is a hack, but many other things can be classified or called fastplace that aren't a hack. For example, drag clicking is illegal, as it's treated as an exploit. A mouse macro or keybind can also do the same thing.
o-o one fucking screenshot doesn't prove anything. Ghost clients and toggle exist kiddo. The only way to 100% prove someone doesn't hack is to screenshare. So in reality, it actually does revolve around screenshares. Just sucks you weren't able to or didn't want to.
Idk what screenshares you've been in buddy, but in my experience, with an experienced screensharer it helps. That's my strat